In today’s competitive business environment, attracting and retaining top talent requires more than offering enticing perks and a positive work culture. Competitive compensation plays a pivotal role in ensuring employees feel valued and motivated. One of the key methods used by HR leaders to ensure competitive pay is through benchmarking—comparing internal compensation levels to market standards. Benchmarking employee compensation allows organizations to evaluate how their salaries stack up against competitors, helping to avoid underpaying or overpaying for key roles. This process provides data-driven insights, enabling informed decisions on compensation strategies.

The Purpose of Benchmarking

Benchmarking employee compensation serves several critical purposes:

1. Attracting and Retaining Talent: Employees are often aware of the market rate for their skills. If an organization’s pay is below market, it can be harder to attract top talent, and current employees may leave for better offers.
2. Equity and Fairness: Internally, it ensures that employees are paid fairly relative to their roles and responsibilities. Externally, it ensures that compensation aligns with industry norms.
3. Avoiding Overpayment: Without proper benchmarking, some roles may be overcompensated, unnecessarily inflating the company’s payroll costs.
4. Supporting Business Strategy: Aligning compensation with market data can help organizations stay financially viable while rewarding high-performing employees appropriately.

Now that we understand the importance of benchmarking, let’s delve into how HR leaders can execute this process efficiently, from obtaining market data to applying it within their organization.

Step 1: Acquiring Salary Market Data

The first step in benchmarking employee compensation is acquiring accurate salary market data. This data is often collected through salary surveys, which provide information on compensation trends across industries, locations, and job roles.

When sourcing salary market data, HR leaders must select surveys that reflect their organization’s specific size and stage. This ensures the comparison is meaningful and relevant. Here’s how to navigate this:

• Size of Organization: Choose surveys that reflect your company’s revenue, employee headcount, or market position. A startup with fewer than 50 employees will have different compensation levels than a well-established enterprise with thousands of employees.
• Stage of Development: If your company is in its early growth stages or heavily funded by venture capital, the compensation data you require will likely differ from a mature, steady-state company that generates stable revenue.
• Geographic Relevance: Compensation levels can vary widely by region, so it’s essential to use data from surveys that consider the cost of living and salary norms in the specific geographic markets where your employees work.

Many leading compensation data providers offer salary surveys based on industry, job roles, company size, and geography. Depending on the complexity of your business, you may need to subscribe to multiple surveys to cover different business units or regions.

Step 2: Matching and Mapping Employees to Job Roles in the Survey

Once you have obtained the market data, the next critical step is matching your employees’ roles to the survey roles. This is often the most tedious and error-prone part of the benchmarking process.

Here are the key steps to do this:

1. Job Role Matching: Begin by reviewing the job titles and descriptions from the salary survey and match them to your organization’s internal roles. Pay particular attention to both job responsibilities and seniority levels to ensure an accurate match. For example, the title "Marketing Manager" can have different responsibilities in different organizations, so you must map based on what employees actually do, not just their job titles.
2. Leveling: Job roles in salary surveys are often divided by career levels, such as entry-level, mid-level, senior, or executive. You will need to map your internal roles to these levels. This step is crucial to avoid comparing salaries for different levels of responsibility. For instance, an "HR Generalist" in one organization may perform tasks similar to a "HR Specialist" in another.
3. Geographic Adjustments: In some salary surveys, data is provided for multiple regions or cities. Be sure to map employees to the correct geographic market to account for regional salary differences. For example, the cost of living and salary rates in San Francisco will be significantly different from those in Austin, Texas.
4. Pay Components: Some surveys include information on different types of pay (base salary, bonuses, stock options, etc.). Ensure you match the pay components in your data with those in the survey to make accurate comparisons.

This mapping process is time-intensive and can easily lead to errors if roles are matched incorrectly. HR leaders should work closely with department heads and managers to validate job matches and ensure that every role is mapped as accurately as possible. This where solutions like OpenComp's are incredibly useful.

Step 3: Analyzing the Data

Once the mapping process is complete, you will have a clear picture of how each employee’s role aligns with market benchmarks. This enables you to analyze the compensation levels within your organization versus the market data.

• Compare Pay by Job Role: Start by reviewing how each internal role compares to the market. Are your salaries higher, lower, or on par with the industry standards?
• Identify Gaps: If certain roles are underpaid relative to the market, you may risk losing talent. Overpaying, on the other hand, can strain your budget unnecessarily. The goal is to identify significant discrepancies that may require adjustments.
• Review Geographic Differences: If your organization operates in multiple regions, compare how salaries differ across locations. This will help you assess whether geographic adjustments need to be made to remain competitive.
• Consider Pay Mix: Analyze how much of your compensation package is tied to base salary versus bonuses or other benefits. This will provide a more holistic view of your organization’s competitive position in the market.

Conclusion

Benchmarking employee compensation is an essential process for HR leaders to maintain competitive and equitable pay structures. By acquiring relevant market data, accurately mapping job roles, and analyzing the data, organizations can gain valuable insights into how their compensation compares to the market. While traditionally tedious and prone to errors, the next generation of compensation planning software solutions, like OpenComp, greatly facilitates this process.

Platforms like OpenComp provide accurate market data and use AI-powered tools to match and level employees accurately, reducing the manual effort and potential mistakes. Additionally, they offer rich data visualization tools that allow HR leaders to easily interpret and analyze compensation trends. By automating much of the benchmarking process and layering in powerful visual insights, solutions like OpenComp enable HR leaders to make more informed, data-driven decisions with far greater efficiency. This evolution in technology not only saves time but also ensures a more precise approach to compensation planning, helping organizations remain competitive while optimizing payroll strategies.

‍